Microgrids, which are small-scale power grids that can operate independently of the larger grid network, are destined to be a part of the future. They provide many benefits for jurisdictions across the United States, including powering critical facilities, reducing carbon emissions, and improving energy resilience during peak use. 

Still, implementing microgrid infrastructure on a widespread basis faces one common but serious issue: state policies in many areas simply don’t support microgrid use on a regulatory level.

It’s Not the Technology That’s Holding Back Progress

Technology readiness is not what’s stopping microgrids from becoming the norm. That they are already powering everything from grocery stores to hyper-scale data centers is proof that the technology is rapidly maturing.

However, lawmakers seem to lack a sense of urgency, and it’s causing a serious delay in adoption. Current methods of generating and distributing energy are already firmly established, and it seems that many leaders simply aren’t interested in changing what they see as a working system.

In some cases, lawmakers are openly hostile to the idea. Recently, the California Public Utilities Commission refused to even hold a hearing to discuss plans to develop privately owned microgrids for residential communities. They would seemingly rather bury power lines underground than implement microgrid solutions for 10% of the cost.

Most States Are Failing This Assignment

This is the subject of a new report by the Colorado-based microgrid advocates at Think Microgrid. The organization rated all 50 states on their readiness to support the microgrid movement using five critical criteria:

• The current state of microgrid deployment
• Proactive microgrid-friendly policies
• A well-documented commitment to energy resilience
• The presence of grid interface platforms for alternative access
• Energy investments made with community equity in mind

Just four states — Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, and Texas — made an above-average grade of “B” when assessed on all five of these criteria. Fifteen states earned a “C,” and the rest were deemed below average in terms of their preparedness to embrace microgrid technology on a policy level.

What’s the Problem Here?

There is widespread concern about power redundancy across the U.S. Long power outages pose serious risks, and solutions are needed to prevent people from losing their lives and possessions. 

Still, states don’t have strategies for incorporating microgrids into their energy distribution strategies. They also don’t know how to restructure the market to incorporate them into a pricing structure. 

Additionally, many states have committed to sustainability and equity goals and reducing carbon emissions. Despite this, they just don’t seem to understand how microgrids can support those efforts. 

Allan Schurr, Chief Commercial Officer at Texas-based microgrid development firm Enchanted Rock, says, “We’re more dependent than ever today on electricity, and because we’re starting to realize how fragile the grid is the need is greater now than ever for what microgrids can offer.”

Right now, many states rely on diesel backup generators. However, stakeholders are starting to realize that these are not just bad for the environment — they’re also less reliable than previously thought. 

A Better Energy Plan Requires Better Attitudes Toward Microgrid Development

Simply put, lawmakers and regulatory agencies need a better understanding of the benefits that microgrids can bring. Also, advocacy organizations must continue to push for change on every level. This is what will ultimately lead to the dream of a distributed energy future becoming a tangible reality.

Read the original article by Tom Zind to learn more about this topic.